Featured
Table of Contents
Federal funding cuts; attacks on equity, immigrants, the rule of law, and the nation's democracy; a brand-new tax bill; and the growing use of synthetic intelligence are just a few of the aspects that have actually overthrown the not-for-profit world. Amid this turmoil, how can funders and their grantees prepare for 2026 and beyond? In this unique bundle, you'll hear from structure leaders and significant donors about providing trends in the coming year and efforts to react to Trump administration hazards.
You'll find bold forecasts from leaders and thinkers throughout the sector about what lies ahead, including what the sector will appear like 5 years from now, and how to react to what promises to be another extraordinary year. It's time to shed our fear and acknowledge that those who desire modification will fail if individuals closest to the cash do not have the courage to bear the most run the risk of.
Kathleen Enright, president & CEO, Council on Foundations The philanthropic sector need to be clear-eyed about the difficulties ahead: the pattern of targeted attacks and government overreach designed to suppress our most essential liberties. John Palfrey, president, MacArthur Foundation Nonprofits are addicted to the hamster wheel of fundraising, and in 2026, AI may supersize both the wheel and the addiction.
Michael McAfee, CEO, PolicyLink It's hard to picture passage anytime quickly of legislation needing greater payment rates. Bella DeVaan and Chuck Collins coordinate the Charity Reform Initiative, Institute for Policy Studies Interaction is no longer background sound.
Dimple Abichandani, author of A New Age of Philanthropy. Lighthouse illustration by Greg Mably for The Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Findings from Church Mutual can assist assist nonprofits as they browse 2026 and modifications in generational providing.
Why Community Leaders are Focusing On Research Funding in 2026With that, here are 5 key takeaways from the Church Mutual 2026 survey: The Church Mutual study found homes of praise continue to take in the lion's share of donations. All 4 generations represented (Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, and Infant Boomers) contributed primarily to locations of praise, making up 74% of charitable donations.
Organizations that have spiritual ties ought to highlight this connection to donors, particularly if they actively support homes of praise or schools. Another crucial finding from the survey was that donors tended to make their contributions towards completion of the year (OctoberDecember). Across the four generations, end-of-year contributions comprised the highest percentage, with JanuaryMarch taking second location, followed by AprilJune, then JulySeptember.
In addition, out of the 4 generations, Gen Z was more than likely to give throughout the slowest time of the year (JulySeptember). Those who operate in the not-for-profit space ought to keep in mind of the end-of-year increase in donations, which shows that OctoberDecember projects such as Offering Tuesday events, matches, etc, might bring in a fundraising windfall.
That said, "slow-down" durations ought to not be ignored, as the younger generations might still be inclined to offer even when the older ones are not. The study consists of an area that details "donation expectations" for 2026, and it is these findings that may sound alarm bells. On the one hand, around half of donors (48%) stated they will not make any modifications to their financial contributions, with Boomers being the group more than likely to leave their charitable providing unchanged.
Millennials were recognized as the group most likely to cut their giving, whereas Gen Z was not only recognized as the group least most likely to cut their offering, but also the group most likely to increase their giving up 2026. Church Mutual has a couple of sections devoted to the main financial concerns of donors, something that falls beyond the scope of this short article.
One finding that nonprofits should likewise know is that a bulk of donors have issues about the monetary health of the groups they support. Church Mutual discovered that 54% of donors are fretted about the financial health of the recipients of their donations. By generation, Gen Z was the most concerned, followed by millennials and Gen X respectively, while Boomers were the least worried.
They must be prepared to address more youthful donors' concerns and be proactive in dealing with any issues affecting the company internally. Doing so might make a distinction in winning over younger donors throughout financially unpredictable times. While lower financial contributions might be worrisome for nonprofits, there may be some excellent news.
When asked if they would increase "time and effort" to assist in other methods should they lower their financial contributions, a bulk of donors indicated they would; 26% said they were "highly likely" and 32% said "somewhat likely," equaling 58% of donors overall. The study suggests these reactions might imply "strong capacity to convert decreased financial giving into more volunteering, advocacy, or other non-financial support." In the face of smaller sized monetary contributions, nonprofits should lean into other channels to engage their donors.
Why Community Leaders are Focusing On Research Funding in 2026There are other findings from Church Mutual that were not covered in this article, such as contribution methods and the top monetary concerns of donors, therefore I motivate all those in the not-for-profit space to check out the report. The findings from Church Mutual can assist guide nonprofits as they navigate 2026, particularly as Gen Z begins to take on a more popular role in the offering world.
Sign up for the Johnson Center's email newsletter! This year marks a turning point for the Johnson Center: the tenth edition of our 11 Trends in Philanthropy report. What started in 2017 as a modest supplement to our yearly report has turned into an extensively read and talked about publication, reaching more than 100,000 readers each year.
Generally, these articles explore brand-new shifts or evolving movements throughout the field of philanthropy. For this tenth edition, nevertheless, we have taken a different technique. Instead of recognizing a wholly brand-new set of emerging patterns, we have actually turned our attention backward to show on the themes that have actually shaped our sector over the previous 10 years, and to name both sustaining shifts and new developments.
It is likewise a recommendation of the minute we discover ourselves in a minute of hyper disturbance, that combines both fantastic stress and anxiety about where we are headed and fantastic possibility for what could follow. Our future feels more unsure than ever, but the chance to develop and scale life-changing innovations for our neighborhoods feels present, as well.
As executive orders, legal contests, and legislative debates play out, we do not have a clear photo of just how much federal financing has been rescinded or withheld from nonprofits and neighborhoods. We do not understand the number of nonprofits have closed or will close their doors, the number of staff have lost their tasks, or how lots of neighborhoods have lost access to vital services.
Latest Posts
Developing More Effective Local Outreach Programs
Converting Impressions to High-Value Sales
Steps for Optimizing Paid Search Campaigns